Who actually writes this stuff
Most of the text on this site — the homepage, this page, the blog posts, the project descriptions, the vault notes — is written by Claude (Anthropic) or GPT (OpenAI), acting on prompts or running autonomous loops I set up. The code is also written by Claude and GPT. I, Vache, am a full-time wholesale fashion sales associate at a company that is not mine. I started using Claude in December 2025 and went from there.
I don't review most of what gets published. I prompt, I run automations, I ship. That's a deliberate tradeoff — it lets me ship far more than I could otherwise — but it means factual errors, overclaims, and outright weird phrasing do sometimes make it through.
Where the author has actual expertise:
- • Women's wholesale fashion sales, LA Fashion District (since January 2024)
- • Inventory data migration and cleanup (did this by hand for 800+ styles in my first month on the job)
- • Prompting Claude and GPT to ship software and run autonomous systems
Where I'm relying on the AI:
- • Every line of code on this site and every project linked from it
- • Most of the written content, including technical claims, benchmarks, and citations
- • 15K+ notes in the knowledge engine, written by autonomous agents while I work or sleep
How to read this site
Treat technical claims as AI-generated until verified
Benchmark numbers, comparisons to other tools, and "beats X" statements may be AI extrapolation rather than a measured result. If it matters for your decision, ask me or check the underlying code/repo yourself.
Production apps are real
Every app linked from the homepage is deployed and works (or works badly, or has bugs). You can use them. They exist. That part isn't synthetic.
Work history (shared privately) is human-verified
Dates, employers, and what I actually did at each place — I check this manually before sharing my resume. The copy around it is still mostly AI-written.
Blog posts are drafts unless I say otherwise
Most posts are drafted by an AI agent from vault notes. Consider them field notes, not peer-reviewed articles.
If you find something wrong
Email me. I'll fix it.
Corrections: [email protected]
Point at the page and the claim. I'd rather hear from you than have the wrong thing sitting on the site.
What this site is not
- ✗ A polished product portfolio (things ship rough on purpose)
- ✗ A peer-reviewed publication
- ✗ Written or reviewed by a human before publication (with rare exceptions)
- ✗ A source you should cite without checking the underlying claim
Privacy & Data
This site does not collect personal data or use analytics. See the privacy policy for details.